LOCAL VIEW —Stafford’s Lane—

It is a dry autumn, and tramping dry woods is wonderful, especially when the weather is mild, (provided you wear loud clothing and sing “I am not a deer” constantly). I have been continuing my study of the deserted farmland, focusing in on the brief period when this town existed as a farming town of the original Puritan sort, before the craze for building mills hit this area. The town was settled in 1750 and likely only existed as a purely farming town for around a quarter century, before people realized that all the rushing streams represented untapped power.

Though in some ways I am of an old and inbred family, dating back to the Pilgrims, one “newer” branch immigrated to America around 1830 due to the mill-building craze. Lore has it the immigrant’s last name may have been “McDoogle”, but he changed it to “Miller” to avoid possible prosecution, as he was recruited from England because he knew “secrets” involving English mills. (It sounds like an early example of industrial espionage to me.) He apparently had a thick Scottish accent, which makes me wonder what he fled in Scotland that wound him up down in England. Then he skipped England. Perhaps he was a bit difficult to get along with. He was a strict Presbyterian who called Christmas Trees “Damned Papist Idolatry.” His wife died shortly after he arrived, and when he remarried his second wife was not of the better Puritan families, but a somewhat mysterious woman known as “Miss Eagle”.  There are murmurs she might have been an Abenaki Indian, which would mean the “newer” branch of the family tree was grafted with the “oldest.”

I bring this up to show the sort of chaos involved in dramatic economic changes, which seemed to clout New Englanders on a regular basis. Those who portray New England as a sort of quaint and changeless place don’t understand the details of our history. Perhaps in Europe there are places when life was lived as it always had been lived, for century after century, (or perhaps not.) America, as far as I can tell, has always been a more dynamic place. Maybe people dream they can “settle down”, but there is an ongoing flow to life that sweeps them off their feet. In the late 1700’s the disruption was the profitability of water power. In the late 1980’s the disruption was the profitability of computers.

As an old man I can’t say I approve of disruptions. I like things the way they were, and it annoys me to have ask my granddaughter how to turn on the newfangled radio in our new car. Life is starting to pass me by, which makes sense, as I can’t run as fast as I used to. I long for that which is lasting, because I tire of learning new ways only to find they are outdated when the newest cell phone comes out.

I find a sort of solace in tramping in the woods, and seeing the ruins of farms that were built by men who obviously thought what they built would be lasting. They left a very real signature on the landscape, whereas the words I type could vanish in a blink, if this computer crashes.

I recently was exploring an abandoned road when I came across a side road that doesn’t even appear on old maps, “Stafford’s Lane.”  It likely was a cart-path useful only to a farmer,  cutting across a ditched pasture. Now it cuts through swampy woods, in what is officially called “wetlands”,  a designation which has prevented the maintenance of the draining ditch, and has turned perfectly good pasture into a mosquito-breeding swamp, during wetter summers, and also killed a large area of trees. Last summer was dry, so even the mosquitoes died, as the “wetlands” became parched soil. This spring, when water returned, it was a most peculiar “wetlands”, for where every other patch of water held a chorus of frogs, this area was totally silent. It was a wetlands without frogs, without fish, without ducks or herons or diving beetles or whirligigs or any wildlife associated with wetlands. There were no pond lilies or pitcher plants or cattails. It was wetlands because some bureaucrat designated it so, and claimed it was “environmentally vibrant”. I think the old-time farmers knew better, when they designated it a “ditched pasture”.

As I walked the lane I noticed a lot of stone had been moved, and that, straight ahead, the lane seemed paved with very big, flat boulders.

Lane 1 IMG_5524

While I might be able to shift the stones of the wall to the right, the flagstones were more than I could have budged even as a young man. (To the left, upstream in the photo above, is the frogless swamp that was bone dry at this time, last year.) As I passed I could not help but pause and look back:

Lane 2 IMG_5521

That is a heck of a big rock to move, just to drive a cart over a miry patch of pasture. I walked back to think about how I might have moved such a stone, back in 1775. Oxen? Block and tackle? And then I looked past the stone and downstream.

Lane 3 IMG_5522

I clambered over the stone wall, and once I was downstream looking back upstream, I became aware more work was involved than I originally assumed.

Lane 4 IMG_5523

As I looked at the amazing amount of stone men moved, before they discovered TV sets, it occurred to me the farmer must have understood some years the pasture would be wet, and some years bone dry. It also occurred to me that cows need to drink. Therefore a smart farmer would not only ditch a pasture, but also create a dam to hold back some of the water on dry years. Moving the stone was therefore an example of human laziness. The farmer did not want to lug buckets of water to his cows, and therefore it made economic sense to lug some stones one time, so he wouldn’t need to lug buckets of water a thousand times.

Still,  the amount of stone moved by people if the past seemed amazing to me. Likely the movers were members of a single, large farm family, improving their single eighty-acre farm. They also likely thought they were making an improvement that would help future farmers on the same farm. I doubt they understood that with the coming of mills their way of life would become old-fashioned, and the farm they worked so hard to clear from wilderness and improve would be turning back to forest within the lifetimes of their grandchildren.

As I thought these somber thoughts I climbed back towards Stafford’s Lane, and startled a frog, who leaped into the pool reflecting sky in the above picture. It made me smile. The frogs were coming back. They were moving upstream, like settlers moving out into the Great Plains in covered wagons to claim homesteads and start farms in the years before the Dust Bowl. Did not the frogs not know that the wetlands they moved up into might again become bone dry, in the future?

Do we know as much, as we pursue our modern aspirations?

These words I write are written on sand,
Like the hearts young lovers stroke upon beaches
With innocent fingers; valentines grand
But fleeting, as the surging tide teaches
All of us that castles crumble, and change
Will wrinkle beauty’s skin, silver her hair,
And make familiar landscapes look so strange
That we can be home and not know we are there.

Ever new is our world. We can’t go back
For our goal is not here, but far higher.
Our aim to settle is really a loaded pack
On our shoulders. Turtles should inspire
For their homes move, as do mice and men
And frogs, when sudden droughts transform their fen.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “LOCAL VIEW —Stafford’s Lane—

  1. A lovely description of ‘the plans of mice and men’. It is easy to forget how useful those labours usually were to their generations. As you said, thinking ahead saves work ie is lazy. My old man told me too, that we find thinking harder than sweating. To our detriment, as I can testify…..
    I have family business at my birthplace from tomorrow, and googled the old farm. Still pasture and some bush, but a horse-training track at the back end. Creeping urbanisation of course, where we once had a draught horse or several, so not much has changed really, so far. Indeed I remember Dad using our Clydesdale to pull the tractor (only the 2nd used on the farm) out of the bog which Dad tile-drained later. And in which the 1st death occured of an attack there in c,1863. Memories that might die with me, which is why old men tell tales.
    The melting arctic doesn’t seem to have realised it too should be dying, I see massive jumps in ice extent on ‘roos’., as Joe B. predicts a sudden end to your warmth. Canadians should be happy. West of the Urals, they might be glad if it hasn’t frozen over yet, like last year. Must have been a hard one.

    • I think every small farmer has a plan in the back of his mind wherein his farm becomes as beautiful as the Taj Mahal. Unfortunately he seldom has the fifteen sons he needs, or wins the lottery. Therefore it is quite typical that one uses old horses to drag new equipment from bogs.

      If you get time, share the tale of the attack in 1863. Likely it is the sort of tale that gets “disappeared” by the politically correct, but lingers as lore in sea-coast taverns.

      Concerning the sea-ice, I am waiting to see if we get the roaring flow up from the Atlantic we got last year. That shoved a lot of ice north in Barents Sea, reducing “extent”, but creating a condensed ice-pack to the north that remained stubborn during last summer’s melt-season.

      As our old friend “Sty” liked to point out, that condensed ice didn’t show in the estimates of “volume”, which made me suspect the ways they estimate, especially when the ice in the Central Arctic refused to melt.

      I do notice the DMI “volume” estimates are higher than last year’s, this autumn.

      Our weather has been so kind you can’t help suspect we will pay for it later. But I am not going to let worry spoil my appreciation of the gift the Creator is giving us.

      • http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/tei-Cow01NewZ-c30.html

        https://nzhistory.govt.nz/media/photo/pukekohe-nz-wars-memorial

        Information available to me shows just two parties wanting that war. Three Auckland Businessmen/politicians and their friends who were seeking profitable investmests including cheap confiscated land; and the Maniopoto chief, Rewi, who had taken control of his neighbouring region of Waikato. This was after the 1st Maori king, Potatau, had died, and his son Tawhiao was too weak to resist. Rewi sought fame as a warrior in the maori belief system and warmongered to get it. He caused another war to his south also.
        The speculators ended up broke because they had over-hyped the demand side, and Rewi lived to fight another/draw a government pension. Instead of fighting forever as he promised. Politicians! Then the Thames gold discoveries rescued the businessmen after some years in financial purgatory. The many dead still await their reward…. But the Waikato is now the greatest pasture-fed unirrigated dairy cow region in the world. After a great deal of investment once we managed to get the right lime, phosphate, clover-nitrogen and drainage into it, in the next century.

        The story about the fatal skirmish at the back of our farm (just below the Church) came from local interviews by the Historian James Cowan in about 1923. My Dad could talk to veterans just like James did, and he never liked land speculation. Nor does his son. The defenders were mainly Ulster Presbyterians – not the best sort of folk to pick a fight with. Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition indeed. But the Maori are great sports, and wouldn’t have had it any other way. I know because i live among them quite happily. But yes, the PC are pushing their evil message. I am having at them as well as their warmist cohorts. At 70, i have better things to do, like sail, travel, drink good ale, and tell tall stories as befits old fellas. Our version of Trump has just been elected with his Party into a position of power under Proportional Representation with a possibly quite socialist version of the Labour Party. NZ
        could be in for interesting times, but an old battler is in there to hold our end up, and he sure knows his onions.

    • I keep playing with your father’s saying, “We find thinking harder than sweating.” That is a good one. Thanks for sharing it (though I was such a dreamer I tended to think as the weeds grew.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.